Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97684 (PNJ)

SUMITRA DEVI v. HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS

CWP/26223/2025 · 2025-09-04

Anupinder Singh Grewal, Deepak Manchanda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 135 SUMITRA DEVI HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondents have raised unauthorised construction in violation of the Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran Bye Laws. They have entire plot area although The boundary wall has natural light and air circulation have been completely obstructed. He has referred to the photographs to the official respondents been taken thereon. 2. Issue notice to respondents 3. At the asking of the Court, Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 2. He submits that the petitioner has also raised unauthorised construction. 4. Heard. 5. The petition consider and decide the representations of the petitioner in accordance with law IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26223-2025 DATE OF DECISION: SUMITRA DEVI Versus HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Shivam Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondents have raised unauthorised construction in violation of the Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran Bye Laws. They have entire plot area although coverage of only 60% The boundary wall has also been damaged and the petitioner’s ventilation, natural light and air circulation have been completely obstructed. He has referred to the photographs at Annexure P-6. The petitioner to the official respondents which are at Annexures P been taken thereon. Issue notice to respondents No.1 & 2 At the asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents He submits that the petitioner has also raised unauthorised construction. Heard. The petition is disposed of with a direction to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner in accordance with law IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 DATE OF DECISION: 04.09.2025 … Petitioner (s) HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL DEEPAK MANCHANDA , Advocate for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondents have raised unauthorised construction in violation of the Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran Bye Laws. They have illegally covered almost the only 60% of the plot area is permissible. also been damaged and the petitioner’s ventilation, natural light and air circulation have been completely obstructed. He has referred The petitioner has also sent representations exures P-3 to P-5, but no action has No.1 & 2 only at this stage. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondents No. 1 & He submits that the petitioner has also raised unauthorised construction. is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representations of the petitioner in accordance with law Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondents have raised unauthorised construction in violation of the Haryana the is permissible. also been damaged and the petitioner’s ventilation, natural light and air circulation have been completely obstructed. He has referred has also sent representations but no action has Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Additional 1 & respondent No.2 to SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.09.05 09:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-26223-2025 -2- within a period of one month. In the event that any unauthorised construction has been raised by the private respondents, the same will be removed by the official respondents within a period of two months thereafter. 6. Needless to say that the official respondents would be at liberty to proceed against the petitioner as well, if she has carried out any unauthorised construction. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 04.09.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.09.05 09:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document