Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97667 (ALL)

RAM NIWAS SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, SECONDARY EDUCATION AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/14086/2025 · 2025-09-17

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14086 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay entire retiral dues of petitioner like Gratuity, Provident Fund, Group Insurance, Leave encashment, G.P.F., Bonus, Arrears of Pension alongwith 10% interest from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment and also pay Monthly Pension regularly to the petitioner. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to decide application dated 09.08.2025 moved by petitioner (Annexure no.10 to the writ petition)." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before the Deputy Director of Education and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Saurabh, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ranjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Niwas Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh, Through Its Secretary, Secondary Education And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before the Deputy Director of Education within two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, Deputy Director of Education is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 18, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 14086 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad