Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97662 (ALL)

KALPANA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/32761/2025 · 2025-10-07

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32761 of 2025 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State functionaries. 2. The petitioners have preferred this writ petition for a direction upon the respondents not to interfere in their married life and also for protection of their lives and liberty. 3. Earlier on 18.9.2025 interim protection was granted by this Court to the petitioners with the observations that the petitioners shall get registered their marriage and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel shall seek instructions in the matter. 4. Now learned State counsel has obtained instructions in the matter which includes an application given by petitioner no.1 to S.H.O., P.S. Chibramau, district- Kannauj that they need not protection from any person and they have not in danger by their parents or police. Moreover, it is also mentioned in the said application that they are living together happily and even they are not in danger or threatened by the local police. 5. In view of the above, as the couple is secure and safe having no apprehension of threat or harassment from any person, they are not required any protection order from this Court. 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. October 8, 2025 Fhd Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Pratap Singh, Vishal Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Kalpana And Another .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad