Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97661 (ALL)

IRSHAD AHMAD v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/32783/2025 · 2025-09-17

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32783 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 & 3 and Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, and learned counsel for the respondent no.3-Nagar Nigam. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:- "(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities not to take land of the petitioner i e. Plot No. 348/8/2M having an area 14 Biswa situated at Bakshi Uparhar, Pargana and Tehsil Sadar, District Prayagraj without adopting due course of law. (ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 21.08.2025 (Annexure No. 7 to the writ petition). (iii) to issue any other suitable writ, order or direction in the nature as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to meet the ends of justice under the facts and circumstances of the present case. (iv) to award cost of writ petition to the petitioner." 3. Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nagar Nigam on instruction, which is taken on record, states that the respondent Nagar Nigam is not proceeding to take any action for demolition etc. The instruction further states that the application of the petitioner for demarcation Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manoj Kumar Singh, Vibhu Rai Irshad Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) of plot is still pending before the Revenue Authority. 4. In view of the instruction as well as statement made by Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nagar Nigam, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition. 5., Consequently, the writ petition is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs. September 18, 2025 NS WRIC No. 32783 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad