JAGPAL SINGH ALIAS JAGPAL AND ANOTHER v. RANBIR AND OTHERS
RA-RS/54/2025 · 2025-09-09
Virinder Aggarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97659 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97659 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
(123)
JAGPAL SINGH ALIAS JAGPAL AND ANOTHER
RANBIR AND OTHERS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Present:- Mr. for the review
**** VIRINDER AGGARWAL
1. Review applicants/appellants has filed the present review application for passing the order for directing trial Court to frame preliminary issue with regard to the limitation and to expunge the finding that in the present case the suit has been filed withi knowledge. 2. As far as counsel for the Review applicants/appellants is heard, there is no ground made out to issue a direction to the trial Court to frame preliminary issue with regard to the limitation. It is below. Review applicants/appellants can move appropriate application before the Court below for the relief claimed in this
3. As far as the other plea of the Review applicants/appellants that the finding, with reg expunged, is concerned, the same has force and the present allowed only to that extent and order dated 22.08.2025 is modified and in para 6 (4th last line) is amended
“In the present case, plaintiff has claimed that suit has been filed within a period of three years from the date of knowledge, as such, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
RA-RS-54
Date of Decision:
JAGPAL SINGH ALIAS JAGPAL AND ANOTHER
Versus RANBIR AND OTHERS
-.- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Kulbhushan Sharma, Advocate, or the review applicants/appellants. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (Oral) Review applicants/appellants has filed the present review application for passing the order for directing trial Court to frame preliminary issue with regard to the limitation and to expunge the finding that in the present case the suit has been filed within a period of three years from the date of As far as counsel for the Review applicants/appellants is heard, there is no ground made out to issue a direction to the trial Court to frame preliminary issue with regard to the limitation. It is below.
It is below. Review applicants/appellants can move appropriate application before the Court below for the relief claimed in this application As far as the other plea of the Review applicants/appellants that the with regard to the suit having been filed within a period of limitation is concerned, the same has force and the present allowed only to that extent and order dated 22.08.2025 is modified and in para 6 last line) is amended and it would read as under:
“In the present case, plaintiff has claimed that suit has been filed within a period of three years from the date of knowledge, as such, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
54-2025 in RSA-2879-2025 Date of Decision:-09.09.2025 … Applicants/Appellants
... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL , Advocate, applicants/appellants. Review applicants/appellants has filed the present review application for passing the order for directing trial Court to frame preliminary issue with regard to the limitation and to expunge the finding that in the present n a period of three years from the date of As far as counsel for the Review applicants/appellants is heard, there is no ground made out to issue a direction to the trial Court to frame preliminary issue with regard to the limitation. It is the discretion of the Court below. Review applicants/appellants can move appropriate application before application. As far as the other plea of the Review applicants/appellants that the ard to the suit having been filed within a period of limitation be is concerned, the same has force and the present review application is allowed only to that extent and order dated 22.08.2025 is modified and in para 6 and it would read as under:-
“In the present case, plaintiff has claimed that suit has been filed within a period of three years from the date of knowledge, as such,
Review applicants/appellants has filed the present review application for passing the order for directing trial Court to frame preliminary issue with regard to the limitation and to expunge the finding that in the present n a period of three years from the date of As far as counsel for the Review applicants/appellants is heard, there is no ground made out to issue a direction to the trial Court to frame the discretion of the Court below.
Review applicants/appellants can move appropriate application before As far as the other plea of the Review applicants/appellants that the be application is allowed only to that extent and order dated 22.08.2025 is modified and in para 6
“In the present case, plaintiff has claimed that suit has been filed within a period of three years from the date of knowledge, as such, SAURAV PATHANIA 2025.09.10 14:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
no ground is made out to interfere in the well reasoned judgment of the learned First App provided to the plaintiff to prove his version by leading evidence”
4. It is expressly made clear that except the aforesaid amendment in the order, remaining order shall remain intact and the same will not ma impact on the order dated 22.08.2025. 09.09.2025 S. Pathania
Whether reasoned / speaking? Whether reportable? no ground is made out to interfere in the well reasoned judgment of the learned First Appellate Court and opportunity is required to be provided to the plaintiff to prove his version by leading evidence” It is expressly made clear that except the aforesaid amendment in the order, remaining order shall remain intact and the same will not ma impact on the order dated 22.08.2025. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL)
Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No no ground is made out to interfere in the well reasoned judgment of ellate Court and opportunity is required to be provided to the plaintiff to prove his version by leading evidence” It is expressly made clear that except the aforesaid amendment in the order, remaining order shall remain intact and the same will not make any (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No
no ground is made out to interfere in the well reasoned judgment of ellate Court and opportunity is required to be It is expressly made clear that except the aforesaid amendment in ke any