Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97651 (ALL)

SANJEET KUMAR YADAV v. MAHESH CHANDRA

A227/11183/2025 · 2025-09-16

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11183 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " Direct the Civil Judge (Sr.Div) Allahabad to decide the pending 6C application filed in Suit No. 623 of 2023 (Ranjeet Kumar Yadav and others Vs Mahesh Chandra) before Court of Civil Judge (Sr.Div) Allahabad, within stipulated period as fixed by the Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Sr.Div) Allahabad to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 17, 2025 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anugrah Pratap Singh, Lavlesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sanjeet Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Mahesh Chandra .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad