MOHAMMAD IMRAN ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14005/2025 · 2025-09-16
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97650 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97650 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14005 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondent no. 4 - Block Education Officer, Naugarh, Siddharth Nagar to forward online arrears of request form of the petitioner to the concerned authority, and for a direction to pay arrears of salary of suspension period i.e. 03.10.2023 to 18.05.2025 pursuant to the
order dated 24.06.2025 passed by respondent no. 2 (District Basic Education Officer, Siddharth Nagar) along with admissible interest.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of his grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioner, no heed has yet been paid. Sri Ram Bhawan Singh, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashok Singh, learned counsel for the respondent BSA submits that in case petitioner moves fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lavlesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh, C.S.C. Mohammad Imran Ansari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2 within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 17, 2025 DS WRIA No. 14005 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad