[2025:JHHC:11824] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3097 of 2025 ------ Vicky Rajak aged about 31 years son of late Dilip Rajak resident of House No.71, Kalindi Basti Old Ulidih, Mango, P.O.+P.S.- Mango, District- East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-21-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No.150 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 316(3)/318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, being the driver of the truck which was transporting rice, cheated the informant by showing fake documents. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that only because the petitioner did not receive the call on his mobile phone, hence, suspicion has been raised but the truck along with the rice loaded upon it had been found intact and the same has been released to the informant. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.12.2024 as mentioned in para-8 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-16 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Seraikella in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No.150 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/