138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4001-2024 (O&M) Decided on:-07.05.2025 Desraj ....Petitioner.. vs. Roshni and others ...Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Sanjiv Kumar Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arshit Goel, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. **** HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that most of the compliance of the settlement arrived at between the parties on 09.09.2021 stands carried out, however, with respect to the remaining, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would ensure that the height of the intervening wall is made upto 6.5 feet and in turn, learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3, on instructions, submits that respondents No.1 to 3 would ensure that the platform measuring 1.5 feet towards the side of the respondents is removed immediately. 1.2 On instructions, learned counsel(s) also submit that the respective litigation(s) shall also be withdrawn by the parties concerned and shall always remain bound by the terms of the aforementioned settlement. 2. In view of the above, no cause survives in the present petition, as such, the same is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. 3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 07.05.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/ No SONIKA 2025.05.08 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document