Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97641 (ALL)

SMT. BASMATI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIB/3769/2025 · 2025-09-16

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3769 of 2025 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. The consolidation proceedings in the village commenced by a notification issued under Section 4 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. An order was passed in favour of the petitioner by the Assistant Consolidation Officer on 09.07.2013 in Case No. 264 Smt. Basmati Devi Vs. Mukhraj. Subsequently, the consolidation proceedings were withdrawn by issuance of a notification under Section 6(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act. Shri Rajesh Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 09.07.2013 having been passed by Assistant Consolidation Officer after the notification under Section 4 of the UP Consolidation of Holdings Act, but prior to the withdrawal of the consolidation proceedings is liable to be implemented. Learned Standing Counsel submits that after the withdrawal of the said proceedings, the consolidation authorities ceased to have jurisdiction in the matter and the revenue court alone has the jurisdiction. Faced with this, learned counsel for the petitioner prays Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Basmati Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) for leave to approach the competent revenue court for grant of appropriate relief as per law. It is always open to the petitioner to avail his legal remedies. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. September 17, 2025 Dhananjai WRIB No. 3769 of 2025 2 (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad