SURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/9680/2025 · 2025-09-08
Yashvir Singh Rathor
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97638 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97638 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-9680-2025 Date of decision: 08.09.2025 SURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners
VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR
, J. (Oral)
1. The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate writ to respondent No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the behest of respondents No.6 & 7 and their accomplice and to take appropriate action against them and further to consider representations dated 11.07.2025 (Annexure P-5), 13.07.2025 (Annexure P-7), 29.08.2025 (Annexure P-8) filed by the petitioners.
2. Notice of motion.
3. On the asking of Court, Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, AAG, Punjab. accepts notice on behalf of the State and assures that respondent No.3- Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala would look into the representations dated 11.07.2025 (Annexure P-5), 13.07.2025 (Annexure P-7), 29.08.2025 (Annexure P-8).
4. In view of the above, respondent No.3-Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala is directed to look into all the representations and decide the same in accordance with law.
5.
Disposed of.
6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR) 08.09.2025 JUDGE Priyanka Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No Priyanka Thakur 2025.09.09 09:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document