235-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-11-2021 Date of Decision: 14.07.2025 Rambir and Others ...Petitioners Vs. State Of Haryana and Another ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- None for the petitioners. Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of advertisement dated 03.12.2020 qua seats occupied by petitioners. 2. Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate submits that during the pendency of instant petition, fresh advertisement dated 18.03.2023 has been issued. The seats occupied by petitioners are not advertised, thus, instant petition has rendered infructuous. 3. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 4. The petitioners are at liberty to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 14.07.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.15 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document