HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11492 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " I. direct the Learned Court of Additional Chief Judge (J.D.)/ Magistrate Duddhi, Sonbhadra to conclude and decide the Contempt Application of the petitioner under order 39 Rule-24 C.P.C., read with section 12 of the Contempt of of Court Act 1971, in Original Suit No.74 of 2020 (Sushila Rani Vs. Anita Devi & others), expeditiously, within an stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that contempt application is pending since 24.07.2020 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Chief Judge (J.D.)/ Magistrate Duddhi, Sonbhadra to consider and decide the aforementioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 22, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anup Kumar Shukla, Ved Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sushila Rani And Another .....Petitioner(s) Anita Devi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad