Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97619 (ALL)

SHATRUDHAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIB/3781/2025 · 2025-10-07

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3781 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. C.M. Amendment Application No. 2 of 2025 1. Amendment application is allowed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to incorporate the necessary correction in the writ petition during the course of the day. Order on petition 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue suitable direction to the respondent No. 2/ Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at Lucknow to decide the Case No. REV/1033/2022 (Computerised Case No. B20220544001033) (Harinath vs. Smt. Baranti Devi) filed by the respondent no.3, under Sections 219 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, pending before the respondent No. 2/ Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at Lucknow, expeditiously within certain stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the aforesaid case/revision under Sections 219 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 is pending since 2022. It is further contended that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Yadav, Vandana Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shatrudhan Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2/ Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh at Lucknow to consider and decide the aforementioned revision, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 8, 2025 Ved Prakash WRIB No. 3781 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad