Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97609 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR MAHTO v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/3403/2025 · 2025-09-16

Shekhar Kumar Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3403 of 2025 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. By means of this application, the only prayer made by the applicant is that a direction be issued to the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge/ J.D. 2nd Gautam Budh Nagar to conclude the proceedings of Complaint Case No.76 of 2017 (Anil Mahto Versus Umesh Tyagi) under Section 138 Ν.Ι. Act, Police Station- Sector 58 NOIDA, District- Gautam Budh Nagar, expeditiously within a short stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has filed a complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act in the year 2017 but the same has not been decided so far due to which, applicant is suffering irreparable loss. Learned counsel further submits that a direction may be issued to the concerned Court to decide the same within specific time. 4. Considering the facts of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the applicant's case, this application U/s 529 B.N.S.S. is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties as expeditiously as possible, if there is no legal impediment. September 17, 2025 Krishna* Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Dubey, Chandra Bhan Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.) Anil Kumar Mahto .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad