Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97606 (PNJ)

GURINDER PAL SINGH AUJLA @ GURI AUJLA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CWP/28618/2024 · 2025-04-22

Sumeet Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-28618-2024 (O&M) 124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28618-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.04.2025 GURINDER PAL SINGH AUJLA @ GURI AUJLA .. Petitioner Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Additional Solicitor General of India with Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Senior Panel Counsel for respondent-UOI. Mr. Anupam Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anurag Chopra, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Salil Sabhlok, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. Vikram Anand, Advocate, Mr. Gautam Pathania, Advocate, Mr. Sukhpal Singh, Advocate, Mr. Jobanbir Singh, Advocate and Mr. Himanshu Bindal, Advocate for respondent-State of Punjab. ... SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE, (ORAL) 1. None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the earlier occasion i.e. 20.03.2025, none had appeared on his behalf. 2. In pursuant to the order of preventive detention passed against the petitioner, he was lodged at Dibrugarh Central Jail, Assam. 3. It is informed by Mr. Anupam Gupta, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Punjab that period of detention under the preventive detention order, expired on 19.03.2025. Thereafter, the petitioner was arrested in connection with offence arising from attack at Police Station Ajanala, Amritsar vide FIR No.39 of 24.02.2023, Police Station Ajnala, Jasmine Kaur 2025.04.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-28618-2024 (O&M) Amritsar (Rural) was registered against him and he has now been lodged in Central Jail, Patiala. 3. The prayer made in this petition was for the transfer of the petitioner from Dibrugarh Central Jail, Assam to some other safe place, which in view of the aforesaid subsequent events that have taken place during the pendency of this petition, appears to have been duly satisfied. 4. In view of above, the cause raised herein has become infructuous and the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE 22.04.2025 (SUMEET GOEL) Jasmine Kaur JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes No Whether reportable Yes No Jasmine Kaur 2025.04.24 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document