BISMILLAH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/9574/2025 · 2025-09-03
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97576 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97576 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 111
Bismillah and another State of Haryana and others
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present :- Mr.
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
CRM-W-1276-2025 The present application has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha petitioners from filing the certified/typed copies of Ann For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the applicants certified/typed copies of Ann The application stands disposed of accordingly. Main case The petitioners namely approached this Court under Articles for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are major and are staying together in live However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-95 Date of decision:
another
VERSUS State of Haryana and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate, for the petitioners.
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) 2025 The present application has been filed under Section 528 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for exempting the applicant from filing the certified/typed copies of Ann For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is and the applicants-petitioners are exempted from filing certified/typed copies of Annexures P-1 to P-3. The application stands disposed of accordingly. The petitioners namely Bismillah and Rujdar Khan ached this Court under Articles 226/227 for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private
Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the itioners are major and are staying together in live However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9574-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 03.09.2025
...Petitioners ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , Advocate, for the petitioners. The present application has been filed under Section 528 of Sanhita, 2023, for exempting the applicants- from filing the certified/typed copies of Annexures P-1 to P-3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is petitioners are exempted from filing
The application stands disposed of accordingly. millah and Rujdar Khan have of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private
Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the itioners are major and are staying together in live-in relationship. However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and ...Respondents SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.03 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
111 CRWP
as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A representation dated at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2 The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Dr. (Ms DAG, Haryana appears behalf of respondents No Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of with a Officer, Police Station look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petit construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above CRWP-9574-2025(O&M) as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A representation dated 14.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that ere is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Dr. (Ms DAG, Haryana appears through video conferencing behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given.
Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 Officer, Police Station Tauru, District Nuh (formerly known as Mewat), look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also in the representation dated 14.08.2025 (Annexure P appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3 2 as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A 3) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the Superintendent of Police, Nuh, Mewat. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that ere is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, through video conferencing and accepts notice on Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given.
Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is to respondent No.3- Station House Tauru, District Nuh (formerly known as Mewat),to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also representation dated 14.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has ioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with d representation to respondent No.3- SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.03 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
111 CRWP
Station House Officer, Police Station Tauru, District Nuh (formerly known as Mewat), for requisite compliance. 03.09.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
CRWP-9574-2025(O&M) Station House Officer, Police Station Tauru, District Nuh (formerly known for requisite compliance. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No 3 Station House Officer, Police Station Tauru, District Nuh (formerly known (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)
JUDGE s/No
Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.03 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document