MANZOOR AHMAD SHEIKH AND ANR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) AND ORS
WP(C)/3103/2024 · 2025-02-03
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9757 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9757 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No.1 Regular list IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 3103/2024 MANZOOR AHMAD SHEIKH AND ANR …Petitioner(s)
Through: None Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER 03.02.2025
1. The institution of this writ petition has taken place with the absence of the counsel for the petitioners on its very first hearing date. Today is the second consecutive date that the counsel for the petitioners has chosen to remain absent from the proceedings, thereby, exposing that the petitioners have filed this writ petition only for the sake of seeking its dismissal for non-prosecution.
2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 03.02.2025 MUBASHIR