RAJ KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA TH SECRETARY GOI MINISTRY OF FINANCE NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WP(C)/995/2022 · 2025-11-26
Shahzad Azeem, Sindhu Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9756 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9756 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 01
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 995/2022
Raj Kumar
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Rahul Pant, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aniruddh Sharma, Advocate
V/s
Union of India and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Suraj Singh Wazir, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
ORDER 26.11.2025
1. Mr. Rahul Pant, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this petition is with regard to the re-opening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, which already stands settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 3005/2022 dated 04.05.2022 in case titled “Union of India and others” vs. “Ashish Agarwal.”
2. He further submits that the present petition is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment.
3. In view of the law already laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present petition. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE
JUDGE
Jammu:
26.11.2025 Vishal Khajuria