LAXMISHANKER AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/32731/2025 · 2025-09-23
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97555 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97555 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32731 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent no.2 i.e. Additional Commissioner, Administration Ist, Mandal Gorakhpur, Gorakhpúr to consider and decide the appeal bearing Case no.510 of 2024, Computerised Case No.C202405000000510 (Laxmishanker and others Versus Bechna Devi and others) under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, preferably by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a stipulated period, if, possible on the next date of hearing."
2. It is contended that against the order passed under Section 24, an appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, is pending consideration before the respondent no. 2. The sole prayer made is for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction to the respondent no. 2- Additional Commissioner, Administration Ist, Mandal Gorakhpur, Gorakhpúr to decide the appeal bearing Case no.510 of 2024, Computerised Case No.C202405000000510 (Laxmishanker and others Versus Bechna Devi and others), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Laxmishanker And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 24, 2025 A. V. Singh WRIC No. 32731 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad