Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36910 of 2025 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State.
2. The present application has been filed by applicant for quashing the recovery warrant dated 18.11.2024 passed by learned Gram Nyayalaya Mant, District-Mathura in Case No.11/XII/2024 (Smt. Rekha Versus Mohanprakash) arising out of Case No. 280 of 2020 (Smt. Rekha Versus Mohan Prakash @ Monu and other), under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, Police Station-Surir, District-Mathura.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that the recovery warrant has been issued against applicant in respect of recovery of Rs.56,000/- in compliance of order dated 15.1.2024 passed by the Gram Nayalaya, Mant, Mathura.
4. Learned counsel for applicant although tried to submit that recovery proceedings are not tenable, however, after some argument, learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant would deposit the amount of Rs.56,000/- with the court concerned within a period of one month from today.
5. In view of statement of learned counsel for applicant, the present application under Section 528 BNSS is disposed off with a direction that the amount sought to be recovered in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Devesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohanprakash .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
pursuance of recovery warrant be deposited by the applicant within a period of one month from today. For a period of one month, recovery warrant dated 18.11.2024 passed by Gram Nyayalaya Mant, District Mathura against applicant shall be kept in abeyance. In default, the court concerned may proceed in accordance with law. October 8, 2025 D. Tamang NA528 No. 36910 of 2025 2 (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad