Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97536 (ALL)

LAXMISHANKER AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/32697/2025 · 2025-09-23

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32697 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer: "I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent no.2 i.e. Additional Commissioner, Administration Ist, Mandal Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur to consider and decide the appeal bearing Case no.1665 of 2021, Computerised Case No.C202105000001665 (Laxmishankear and others Versus Bechna Devi and others) under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously, preferably by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law." 2. It is contended that an appeal is pending consideration before respondent no.2, which is registered as Case No.1665 of 2021 (Computerized Case No. C202105000001665) under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the said appeal. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent no.2- Additional Commissioner, Administration Ist, Mandal Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur to decide Case No.1665 of 2021 (Computerized Case No.C202105000001665) under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 24, 2025 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jitendra Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Laxmishanker And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad