Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5586 of 2025 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Shri Ajatshatru Pandey, learned counsel for the revisionist states that the present criminal revision was filed against the rejection of discharge application but since the charges have been framed in the matter, the revisionist wants to withdraw the present revision with liberty to file fresh criminal revision, and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
2. In view of the statement made, the criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the revisionist as per rule after retaining a photostat copy of the same on the record. September 18, 2025 safi Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ajatshatru Pandey, Sarfaraz Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Mohammad Faizan .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad