IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 115 Kamla Devi and another State of Haryana and CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. Siddarth, Advocate, for the petitioners. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The petitioners namely approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the petitioners are However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A representation dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2 The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a consta Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9584 Date of decision: Kamla Devi and another VERSUS State of Haryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Siddarth, Advocate, for the petitioners. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Kamla Devi approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the major and are staying together in live However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A representation dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Sonipat The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana, through video conferencing, accepts notice on behalf of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9584-2025(O&M) Date of decision: 03.09.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Mr. Siddarth, Advocate, for the petitioners. Kamla Devi and Rajat Sharma have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their life and personal liberty from private respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that the major and are staying together in live-in relationship. However, their relationship is not acceptable to the private respondents and as a result thereof, the private respondents are threatening the petitioners. A 3) against the threat extended at the hands of the private respondents already stands submitted by the Superintendent of Police, Sonipat. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that nt danger of them being implicated in a false case. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, , accepts notice on behalf of ...Respondents SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.03 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 115 CRWP respondents No. Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of with a direction Officer, Police Station grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed the representation dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure P action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropr respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above Station House Officer, for requisite compliance. 03.09.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable CRWP-9584-2025(O&M) .1 to 3. Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of with a direction to respondent N Officer, Police Station Civil Line, Sonipat, District Sonipat grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed the representation dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure P for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3 Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line, Sonipat, District Sonipat for requisite compliance. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Learned State counsel has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is to respondent No.3- Station House , District Sonipat to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure P-3) and take appropriate for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners nothing in this order shall be iate action by the police authorities in The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with said representation to respondent No.3- Civil Line, Sonipat, District Sonipat (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.03 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document