VINAY KUMAR AGNIHOTRI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/13955/2025 · 2025-09-16
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97526 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97526 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13955 of 2025
Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Mr. Manvendra Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2& 3 and perused the record. The present writ petition has been filed inter-alia for the following reliefs:-
" I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to transfer from Upper Primary School Kanhaupur to any of the following institution where the post is still vacant, i.e. Upper Primary School Lalpur Sagauni Block and District Mainpuri, Composite School Dharausi Block Ghiror District Mainpuri, Upper Primary School Oye Block Ghiror District Mainpuri, Upper Primary School Nasirpur Block Ghiror District Mainpuri & Upper Primary School Usnidha Block Ghiror District Mainpuri in light of Notification dated 22.07.2025. II. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 02.09.2025 (Annexure no.15) within stipulated period of time. III. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents no.2 to pay the arrears of salary pertaining to suspension period. IV. Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and peroper into the facts and circumstances of the case. V. Award cost of the writ petition." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : B.S. Pandey, Kartikey Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manvendra Singh Vinay Kumar Agnihotri And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for ventilation of his grievances, the petitioners have approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioners, no heed has yet been paid.
Learned counsel for the State-respondents submits that in case petitioners move fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2; Basic Shiksha Parishad through its Secretary within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 17, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 13955 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad