Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9751 (HP)

CHUNI LAL v. NIPUN JINDAL AND ANR

COPC/504/2025 · 2025-06-03

Sandeep Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.504 of 2025 Date of Decision: 03.06.2025 _______________________________________________________ Chuni Lal …….Petitioner Versus Nipun Jindal & another … Respondents Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashok K umar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): By way of instant contempt petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for their having intentionally and deliberately disobeyed the mandate contained in judgment alleged to have been violated, wherein direction came to be issued to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of six weeks. Since needful never came to be done within the stipulated time, petitioner approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2. Before notice, if any, could be issued to the respondents, Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, learned counsel representing the respondents, while placing on record communication dated 15.02.2025, issued under the signatures of Dy. Divisional Manager, 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, states that outstanding amount of DCRG has been paid to the petitioner, whereas sum of Rs. 6, 76,700/- on account of leave encashment shall be released expeditiously. Though, learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly acknowledges factum with regard to receipt of amount on account of DCRG, but he states that necessary direction may also be issued to release the amount on account of leave encashment. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly same are closed, but with a direction to the respondents to ensure that amount, if any, on account of leave encashment shall be released expeditiously, preferably within of two months in favour of the petitioner. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge June 03,2025 (shankar)