- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1565 WP No. 200541 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 200541 OF 2025 (EDN-EX) BETWEEN: SHREEDEVI D/O TIPPANNA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: NEAR DEVAMMA TEMPLE, CHITTAPUR, TALUKA CHITTAPUR, DISTRICT KALABURAGI – 585 211. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAMCHANDRA K, ADVOCATE FOR SRI GURUBASAVA NAYAK, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE REGISTRAR (EVALUATION) RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, KARNATAKA 4TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 041. 2. THE PRINCIPAL ESIC COLLEGE OF NURSING, KALABURAGI – 585 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R.J.BHUSARE, ADVOCATE FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH) Digitally signed by BASALINGAPPA SHIVARAJ DHUTTARGAON Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1565 WP No. 200541 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS TO REVALUATION OF ANSWER SHEET OF THE PETITION ON THE SUBJECT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING AS PER ANNEXURE-H AND ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS AFTER REVALUATION IF THE PETITIONER IS GETTING MARKS IN THE SAID SUBJECT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING AND DECLARED THE RESULT OF THE PETITIONER AND ISSUE FRESH MARKS CARD AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for respondents No.1. 2. The petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus to direct respondents to revaluate the answer sheet of the petitioner which is marked at Annexure – F and Writ of Mandamus is also sought to issue fresh marks card pursuant to the revaluation. In addition, the petitioner has also sought a writ of mandamus to consider the representation at Annexure – K. 3. The admitted factual position is that the petitioner enrolled to BSC Nursing in 2nd respondent – college at - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1565 WP No. 200541 of 2025 Kalaburagi. It appears that the petitioner has appeared for the final examination of BSC Nursing. The answer sheet is evaluated. The petitioner is not happy with the marks which has been awarded. Hence, the writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus to direct respondent No.1 to conduct revaluation of the answer sheet. 4. Learned for the respondent would submit in view of the law laid down by this Court in Navera Vs. Registrar Rajeev Gandhi University in W.P No.200396/2025, the writ cannot be issued to revaluate the answer sheet as the provision do not contemplate revaluation of answer sheet. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that his representation requesting revaluation is not yet considered by 1st respondent. 6. Learned counsel for 1st respondent would submit that necessary endorsement will be issued to the petitioner after considering the representation marked at Annexure – K. 7. Hence the following: - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1565 WP No. 200541 of 2025 ORDER i) The writ petition is allowed in part; ii) 1st respondent shall consider the representation annexed at Annexure – K and thereafter to issue appropriate endorsement to the petitioner. iii) This exercise shall be completed within a period of three weeks from today. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE THM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16