Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97478 (ALL)

RANDHIR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/36715/2025 · 2025-09-22

Dinesh Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36715 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent. 2. The applicants have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 BNSS assailing the summoning order dated 4.6.2025 passed by Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act, Saharanpur. 3. Learned A.G.A. has raised a preliminary objection qua maintainability of the instant application under Section 528 BNSS on the ground of availability of an alternative remedy to file an appeal under Section 14-A of the S.C./S.T. Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants has not refuted the contention as raised by the learned AGA qua availability of the alternative remedy as mentioned above. 5. In this conspectus, as above, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail an alternative remedy as mentioned above. 6. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the documents annexed with this application to the learned counsel for the applicants after retaining its photostat copy at the relevant place. September 23, 2025 vkg Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashfaq Ahmed Ansari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Randhir And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad