Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9747 (UTT)

JAINENDRA KUMAR JHA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/368/2020 · 2025-07-23

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6475-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB No.368 of 2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Dushyant Mainali, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. P.S. Bisht, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner makes a statement at Bar that writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time. 4. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 23.07.2025 SS