HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13938 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, petitioner wants age relaxation in respect of the recruitment to be conducted by the respondents pursuant to the advertisement published in the year 2025 in view of the relaxation granted to certain category of the candidates vide Government Order dated 26.05.2025. 3. Learned Standing Counsel raises objection regarding maintainability of this petition but now at this stage when the petitioner had already gone over aged in the year 2022 itself it is submitted that in identical set of facts this Court has dismissed a petition being Writ A No.13689 of 2025 (Naveen Bhati and 2 others v. State of U.P. and 3 others) vide order dated 12.09.2025. 4. Upon a pointed query being made, learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute that petitioners' year of birth is 1986 and hence they had gone over aged against the advertisement published in the year 2022 itself. 5. In view of the above, I find no justification to grant indulgence in the matter when a coordinate Bench Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Yadav, Sudhanshu Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dhirendra Prasad Yadav And 3 Other .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Other .....Respondent(s) has already declined to grant indulgence 6. Accordingly, petition lacks merit and is dismissed. September 17, 2025 Deepika WRIA No. 13938 of 2025 2 (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad