G SHANMUKHA SIVA SAI SURYANARAYANA @ SURYA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/5775/2025 · 2025-03-07
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9746 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9746 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5775 OF 2025 Between: G Shanmukha Siva Sai Suryanarayana @ Surya G.Sitaramanjaneya Prasad, Aged 42 years. Occ Advocate, R/o. D.No.29-5-10, Cherukupalli Vari street, Governorpet. Vijayawada, NTR District - 520002. S/o. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, A.P. Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P Police Headquarters at Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Commissioner of Police, NTR District, Vijayawada. 4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, ACP South Division, NTR District, Vijayawada. 5. The Station House Officer, Suryaraopet Police Station, Suryaraopet, Vijayawada. 6. Gaddamanugu Maheswari Devi @ Polamarasetti Venkata Maheswari Devi @ Kandula Venkata Maheswari Devi, W/o Kandula Bhargav Krishna, aged 37 years
7. Kandula Bhargav Krishna, S/o Kandula Srinivasa Rao, Aged 28 years. 8. Duggirala Vignesh, S/o Duggirala Venkata Manikya Sita Rama Somayajulu, Aged 23 years. 9. Duggirala Ashtalakshmi, D/o Duggirala Venkata Manikya Sita Rama Somayajulu, Aged 23 years. Respondent Nos.6 to 9 are residents of D.No.23B-3-27 Kunapalli Vari Street, R.R.Peta, Eluru - 534002. ...Respondents
f Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.5 in not registering a First Information Report (F.I.R) against Respondent Nos.6 to 9 pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated 06.11.2024 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, Consequentially direct the Respondent No.5 herein to register a First Information Report (F.I.R) pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated 06.11.2024. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent No.5 herein to register a First Information Report (F.I.R) pursuant to the complaint of the petitioner dated 06.11.2024, pending disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents 6 to 9: The Court made the following order:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5775/2025 APHC010108212025 [3457] J Between; G Shanmukha Siva Sai Suryanarayana @ Surya AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VVINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following; ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT{S)
Sr 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5775/2025
ORDER: The petitioner is alleging that the 5**^ respondent is not receiving the complaint made by the petitioner against the respondent Nos.6 to 9, i.e., the respondent No.6 is the wife of the petitioner, respondent No.7 is known to the 6^'^ respondent, respondent No.8 is the brother of the 6'^^ respondent, and the respondent No.9 is the sister of the 6'^ respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that certain
2. th matrimonial disputes arose between the petitioner and the 6 respondent, as such, the petitioner intends to file a complaint.
3. Perused the complaint. The petitioner submits that though the complaint dated 06.11.2024 was sent by registered post to the 5^'^ respondent, no
4. action has been taken. In view of the above submissions, this Court opines that if
5. the petitioner intends to take appropriate steps against the respondent Nos.6 to 9, he has to approach the competent Magistrate Court, for redresssal of the grievance.
3
6. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,/ //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh A.P. Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District.
2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P Police Headquarters at Mangalagiri, Guntur District.
3. The Commissioner of Police, NTR District, Vijayawada.
4. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, ACP South Division, NTR District, Vijayawada.
5. The Station House Officer, Suryaraopet Police Station, Suryaraopet, Vijayawada.
6. One CC to Sri V Vinod K Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
8. Two CD Copies RAM
HIGH COURT DATED:07/03/2025
ORDER WP.No.5775 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS