MARUTI BABAN JADHAV v. SANDEEP MACHHINDRA ROKADE AND OTHERS
CA/2156/2025 · 2025-02-24
Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9744 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9744 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2156.25ca (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
15 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2156 OF 2025 IN/WITH PIL/50/2023 MARUTI BABAN JADHAV AND OTHERS VERSUS SANDEEP MACHHINDRA ROKADE AND OTHERS …. Mr S. S. Bora, Advocate for applicants Mr D. R. Markad, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr A. V. Lavte, A.G.P. for respondents/State Mr S. B. Parnere, Advocate for respondent No.7 Mr M. P. Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.8 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2025 IN PIL/50/2023 SANDEEP MACHHINDRA ROKADE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS …. Mr D. R. Markad, Advocate for applicants Mr A. V. Lavte, A.G.P. for respondents/State Mr S. B. Parnere, Advocate for respondent No.5 Mr M. P. Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.6 CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND
PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.
DATE : 24th February, 2025 2025:BHC-AUG:5358-DB
2156.25ca (2) PER COURT:
1. Pursuant to the directions of this Court on the last date, the learned A.G.P. tenders across the bar a report dated 21/02/2025 received from the Collector, Ahilyanagar. The report is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for the purpose of identification.
2. The learned advocate for the intervenors, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the civil application with liberty to the applicants to resort to the appropriate remedy as is available to them in law.
3. Leave is granted. The civil application is disposed of with liberty to the applicants as is prayed for.
4. Stand over to 24/03/2025.
5. The progress shall be reported.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) sjk