HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7700 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Mr. Shahnawaz Akhtar, Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of informant. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard counsel for the applicant, counsel for the informant, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 50 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 333, 109, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4), 118(1) of B.N.S. and Section 7 of Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, Police Station Kunwargaon, District Budaun. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per the first information report, the applicant along with seven named accused is alleged to have assaulted three persons namely informant- Khush Naseeb, Sajiya and Najiya. As per the medical report as well supplementary medical report of Sajiya and Najiya, the injuries received by them were simple in nature. Injured- Khus Naseeb received three injureis. The injury nos. 1 and 2 were simple in nature. The injury no. 3 was referred for x-ray examination. As per the x-ray report, fracture of third metacarpal bone in the left hand finger is seen. A vague role has been assigned to the applicant. It is contended that the injury no. 3 of Khus Naseeb was grievous in nature but not dangerous to life. The nature of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brijesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd Ali .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) injuries to the three injured shows that there was no intent to murder. At this stage, there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The investigation is still pending. It is next submitted that the applicant has apprehension of his arrest and in case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 5. Learned A.G.A. and counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Counsel for the applicant further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the applicant, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicant and the fact that a vague role has been assigned to the applicant, the nature of injuries to the three injured shows that there was no intent to murder, at this stage, there is no substantive evidence against the applicant, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicant- Mohd. Ali be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193 (3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before NABAIL No. 7700 of 2025 2 the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant. 9. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 10. The applicant is directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 11. The application stands disposed of. September 19, 2025 Sachin Mishra NABAIL No. 7700 of 2025 3 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad