COCP No.3976 of 202 IN TH 156 NEETU SHARM Vs SH. KAMAL KIS CORAM: HON' Present: Ms. T for th Mr. G HARKESH MAN 1. Shor to the Governme been filed in Cour 2. Lear from Mr. Shashi G (Mohali) informs favour of the petit 3. In vi counsel for the pe 4. Dism 5. How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioner tow listing of revival a January 17, 202 Atik Wheth Wheth 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De ARMA ...... L KISHOR YADAV ....Re ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Ms. Tarranum Madan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G., Punj **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Short reply by way of affidavit of Sh ernment of Punjab, Department of Sc n Court, the same is taken on record. Learned State counsel representing hashi Gagg, Asstt. Registrar (Legal) o nforms that arrears amounting to Rs e petitioner within four weeks from to In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioner does not press the presen Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioner wou etition and in that eventuality, the er y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from er towards litigation expenses, imm vival application. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.3976 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 17.01.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondent ESH MANUJA ., Punjab. t of Sh. Kamal Kishor Yadav, Secretar t of School Education, Chandigarh ha enting the respondent on instruction gal) office of D.S.E. (SE) S.A.S. Nag to Rs.8,51,304/- shall be released rom today. ertaking by the respondent(s), learne present petition. stands discharged. is not done within the aforementione er would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o , immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 ecretary arh has ructions . Nagar ased in learned ntioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.18 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment