BILAL AHMAD BAJAD AND ANR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) AND ORS
WP(C)/3108/2024 · 2025-02-03
Sindhu Sharma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9740 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9740 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 87 Suppl. List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 3108/2024 CM No. 8464/2024 Bilal Ahmad Bajad and Anr. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Shahrukh Rashid, Adv. Vs. UT of JK and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mubashir Majid Malik, Dy.AG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE.
ORDER 03.02.2024
01. The petitioners seek a direction to respondents 1 to 8 to provide them the police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from respondent Nos. 9 to
16. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and out of their free will they got married. Copy of Nikahnama has been placed on record. They submit that since they have contracted the marriage against the wishes of respondent Nos.9 to 16, as such, they are facing harassment at their hands. Petitioner no. 2 in support of her age proof has placed on record Aadhar Card issued by Government of India.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and anr., 2006 (5) SCC 475, and submits that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.
3. Any person having attained the age of majority is entitled to contract the marriage as per his/her wishes and the police department is duty bound to protect the life and liberty, if approached. However, it appears that the petitioners have not ever approached the official respondents for their indulgence in the matter for providing protection to them.
4. In this view of the matter, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, by providing that the respondents 1 to 8 shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for providing them adequate security and to ensure that nobody interferes in their married life, if they approach them. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of their marriage.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(SINDHU SHARMA)
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 03.02.2025
“SHAMIM DAR”