Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97395 (ALL)

KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/33055/2025 · 2025-09-18

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33055 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent nos. 6 and 7 has forcefully constructed the road on the land of the petitioner and the road construction work was completed on 18.12.2024. 2. The question as to whether the road has been constructed on the land of the petitioner is a question of fact, which can be decided on the basis of pleading and evidence on record. 3. Since, the controversy involved in the present writ petition is based on question of fact, therefore, the relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition cannot be granted in the present writ jurisdiction. 4. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy as may be available to him under law. September 19, 2025 sailesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhuvaneshwar Singh, Ramesh Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Krishna Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad