CR-6051-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CR-6051-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2025 RAJBIR JAGLAN ALIAS RAJVIR SINGH JAGLAN ....Petitioner(s) VERSUS KRISHAN MANGAL ....Respondent(s) CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. PARMOD GOYAL, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been preferred by judgment debtor against execution of judgment dated 21.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) passed by Additional District Judge, Panipat. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that earlier an execution petition was preferred by decree holder which was compromised and the said execution petition was withdrawn. The period stated in compromise is still to expire and with mala fide intentions, decree-holder has again filed a execution petition without disclosing compromise between the parties and payment received by it and as such, succeeded in getting exparte order of attachment. 3. A perusal of impugned order goes to show that on 21.08.2025, the matter was taken up for attachment and sale of House no.4 & 5, Angel House Gate No.2, Ansal City, Panipat. The application was allowed and property was ordered to be attached and matter was adjourned to 05.09.2025 for date already fixed for appearance of judgment debtor. Only attachment Deepak Patwal 2025.09.09 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-6051-2025 (O&M) 2 has been passed by learned Executing Court and the same is an interim order. Therefore, no interference is warranted at this stage. 4. Judgment debtor shall be free to approach the Executing Court and show all the facts being stated before this Court regarding previous compromise, payment if any made and also fact that time as agreed is still to lapse. Petitioner may seek relief in accordance with law by seeking withdrawal of the attachment orders. 5. Present petition is disposed of with above observations. 6. The petitioner is relegated to seek his remedy to challenge attachment in accordance with law. (PARMOD GOYAL) 03.09.2025 JUDGE Deepak Patwal 1. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether reportable Yes/No Deepak Patwal 2025.09.09 14:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document