Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97346 (ALL)

PUSHPA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHER

WRIC/32302/2025 · 2025-10-06

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32302 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. There is certain discrepancy in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh petition. October 7, 2025 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Pushpa Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Other .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad