Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97342 (PNJ)

NEETU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/9551/2025 · 2025-09-02

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 125 NEETU AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, 1. Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. 2. the Senior Sup directed to look into the representation dated made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. 3. and their dates of birth are copies of their IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision NEETU AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Deepak Kumar Bartia, Advocate, for the petitioners. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the wishes of their family members. Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, i.e. respondent No.2 directed to look into the representation dated made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major d their dates of birth are 11.08.1996 and 07.07.1992, copies of their Aadhar cards are appended as Annexures P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9551-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 02.09.2025 ....Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents, as they have attained majority and married against the Learned counsel states that the petitioners will be satisfied if erintendent of Police, Patiala, i.e. respondent No.2 is directed to look into the representation dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure P-6), made to him by them and take appropriate action on the same. As per the averments made, both the petitioners are major 11.08.1996 and 07.07.1992, respectively. The cards are appended as Annexures P-1 and P-2, PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.02 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-9551-2025 -2- respectively. They got married on 29.08.2025 and the Marriage Certificate is enclosed with the petition as Annexure P-5. 4. Notice of motion. 5. At the asking of the Court, Mr. M.S.Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioners. 6. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and without going into the merits of their claim, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 29.08.2025 (Annexure P-6) and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. 7. It is however, made clear that this order shall not preclude the authorities to proceed against the petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any other criminal proceedings, instituted/pending against them if there is some evidence that surfaces regarding their involvement in a cognizable offence, for which they may be required by the investigating agency. 02.09.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.02 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.