132+130+238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 1. SHERI MAHANT ALIAS SHERI SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER 2. SALMA MAHANT AND ANOTHER STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Mr. Saurabh Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Nitesh Sharma, DAG, Punj Mr. Harjinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the complainant/respondent No.2. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. This order of mine shall dispose of both the aforementioned cases together as both are arising out of th are borrowed from Singh v/s State of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SHERI MAHANT ALIAS SHERI SINGH V/S PUNJAB AND ANOTHER SALMA MAHANT AND ANOTHER V/S PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Abhishek Masih, Advocate for Mr. Saurabh Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nitesh Sharma, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Harjinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the complainant/respondent No.2. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) This order of mine shall dispose of both the aforementioned cases together as both are arising out of the same FIR. For the sake of brevity, facts are borrowed from CRM-M-52157-2024 titled as State of Punjab and another. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 02.07.2025 CRM-M-52157-2024 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS CRM-41177-2024 in/and CRM-M-24074-2024 ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR for the complainant/respondent No.2. This order of mine shall dispose of both the aforementioned cases e same FIR. For the sake of brevity, facts titled as Sheri Mahant alias Sheri MANISHA 2025.07.02 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment CRM-M-52157 & 01 connected case 2. Present petition seeking quashing of FIR No.115 dated 15.09.2023 registered under Sections 323, 341, 506, 294, 34, 160 and 120 added later on) (Annexure P-1) P-2). 3. Learned State petitions have not been filed on behalf of all the accused. As such, it is a partial compromise, which is not maintain rendered by Division Bench of this Court. 4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petition impleading all the stakeholde 5. Dismissed as withdrawn 6. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected case. July 02, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) 52157-2024 -2- & 01 connected case Present petitions have been filed under Sect seeking quashing of FIR No.115 dated 15.09.2023 registered under Sections 323, 341, 506, 294, 34, 160 and 120-B of IPC (Sections 325 and 379 at Police Station Fatehgarh Sahib, District Fatehgarh Sahib on the basis of compromise deed dated 14.08.2024 (Annexure Learned State counsel, at the very outset, submits that the present petitions have not been filed on behalf of all the accused. As such, it is a partial compromise, which is not maintainable in terms of the judgment rendered by Division Bench of this Court. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petitions and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition after impleading all the stakeholders. ismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.115 dated 15.09.2023 registered under Sections B of IPC (Sections 325 and 379-B of IPC at Police Station Fatehgarh Sahib, District Fatehgarh Sahib on the basis of compromise deed dated 14.08.2024 (Annexure counsel, at the very outset, submits that the present petitions have not been filed on behalf of all the accused. As such, it is a able in terms of the judgment In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition after with liberty as prayed for. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of other connected HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.07.02 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment