M/S SHRI RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED (NON BANKING FINANCE) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/224/2022 · 2026-08-23
Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 973 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 973 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:20640
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 224 of 2022 1 - M/s Shri Ram Transport Finance Company Limited (Non Banking Finance) Registered Under Rti And Company Act 1956, Office At First Floor, Mukambika Complex No. 4, Lady Deska Road, Melapore, Chennai- 6000004 (Tamilnadu), Administrative Office, 101-105, First Floor, B-Wing, Shiv Chamber Sector-11, Cbd, Wellapur, Navi Mumbai- 400614, State Office Near Agrasen Chowk, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Through Its Branch Manager Paras Dewangan S/o Vishwamitra Dewangan, Aged About 41 Years, Manager, Bilaspur Branch No.2, Agresen Chowk, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Transport Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Appellate Authority-Cum-Additional Commissioner Transport, Chhattisgarh, Office At Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.,
District
:
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh 3 - Taxation Authority-Cum-District Transport Officer, Office At Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham),
Chhattisgarh VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR Date: 2025.05.08 12:08:42 +0530
2 4 - Rajesh Sahu, Aged About 36 Years House No. 6, Naya Para Kutki Para, Sahaspur, Lohara, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :- None For State :- Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 06.05.2025
1. Heard.
2. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha