TANIKSHA MEHRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/9548/2025 · 2025-09-03
Subhas Mehla
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97296 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 97296 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-9548-2025 1
107
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-9548-2025
Date of decision: 03.09.2025
TANIKSHA MEHRA AND ANOTHER
....Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G. Punjab.
**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J (Oral):
1.
The prayer in the instant criminal writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to take an appropriate action against respondents No.4 to 7, who are harassing and threatening the petitioners by interfering in their peaceful life and liberty.
2.
In this regard, this Court has already given the directions in Asha and another vs. State of Haryana and another, CWP No.6717 of 2009, decided on 25.07.2012 and in compliance of the same, the State Government had taken steps to protect the life and liberty of run away couple.
3.
Apart from that the State of Punjab vide notification dated 23.01.2025 also notified the SOPs for the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners in similar situations, in compliance of the Criminal Writ Petition No.12562 of 2023 titled as “Kajal Vs. State of Haryana and others”.
4.
In the light of the above directions, the petitioners are directed to approach the concerned authorities.
5.
Disposed of.
(SUBHAS MEHLA)
JUDGE 03.09.2025 monika
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No
2. Whether reportable
: Yes /No MONIKA RANI 2025.09.09 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document