IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (123) Raj Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. State of Punjab & others CORAM : Present:- DEEPAK SIBAL pendency of the instant writ petition, in pursuance to the impugned show cause notice dated 18.07.2025 (Annexure P he be permitted to withdraw the in final order. 2. September 25 sailesh IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (123) Raj Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Punjab & others CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr.Ajay Jagga, Advocate Ms.Sonia Mittal, Advocate Ms.Aishwarya Jagga, Advocate, for the petitioner (s). Mr.Saurabh Kapoor, Addl.A.G., Punjab. ***** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since during the pendency of the instant writ petition, in pursuance to the impugned show cause notice dated 18.07.2025 (Annexure P-3), the he be permitted to withdraw the instant petition, with liberty to challenge the final order. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty, as prayed for. September 25th, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether Reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25930-2025 Decided on : 25.09.2025 ……Petitioner(s) Versus ……Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI Ms.Aishwarya Jagga, Advocate, for the petitioner (s). Mr.Saurabh Kapoor, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since during the pendency of the instant writ petition, in pursuance to the impugned show cause the State has passed the final order, stant petition, with liberty to challenge the Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty, as prayed for. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ……Petitioner(s) ……Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since during the pendency of the instant writ petition, in pursuance to the impugned show cause State has passed the final order, stant petition, with liberty to challenge the SAILESH RANJAN 2025.09.26 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document