APHC010107892020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 6583/2020 Between: 1. NUNNA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.NAGESWARA RAO AGED 55 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.3-43-24, BALAJI NAGAR, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, , GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GAJUWAKA POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. TAHSILDAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. MANCHIPILLI BANGARAMMA, W/O.RAMBABU AGED 55 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO.5-70/3/ 1, SEETHAMMAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.3 and 4 in interfering with the civil disputes and coercing the petitioner to settle the matter in compromise with unofficial respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondent No.3 and 4 not to harass the petitioner by calling to the police station for land settlement and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with the civil disputes and coercing the petitioner to settle the matter in compromise with unofficial respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to harass the petitioner by calling to the police station for land settlement and to pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions would submit that till date, respondent Police did not receive any complaint or case whatsoever against the Petitioner and no crime is registered against the Petitioner and never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 3 In the light of the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 6583 of 2020 12.09.2025 Mjl /*