Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11181 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. This petition has been filed for following relief:
"Direct the Civil Judge (J.D.) Jewar, Gautam Buddh-nagar to decide the suit no. 91/2012 (Jwala Prasad and others Vs. Gayalal and another) moved by the Plaintiffs/Respondents within stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court. (Annexure no. 1 to the Petition)."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the suit is pending since 2012. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously.
4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Jewar, Gautam Buddh- nagar to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rishabh Shukla, Yogendra Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Gaya Lal And Another .....Petitioner(s) Jwala Prasad And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the parties concerned and after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned as well as opportunity to lead evidence in support of their case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 17, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11181 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad