Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97235 (ALL)

RAMNATH VERMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/32646/2025 · 2025-09-23

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32646 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel as to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the order impugned is revisable. 2. In view of the said fact, no writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India lies. 3. Writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. However, it is open to the petitioners to file a revision before the revisional Court within 15 days. 4. In case, the said revision is filed within the period mentioned above, revisional Court shall not go into the question of limitation and decide the same strictly in accordance with law. September 24, 2025 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh, Vidyanand Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ramnath Verma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad