Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97229 (ALL)

PRASHANT OJHA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/33060/2025 · 2025-09-18

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33060 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent- authority is not releasing the amount of Rs. 47,375.90/- in favour of the petitioner, which had been deposited by him as 1% charges of revenue receipt towards registration of the sale deed of the property vide UTR No. 000399907692 dated 16.5.2022 through online mode. The petitioner further seeks a direction to the respondent-authority to decide his representation within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no. 4 Sub Registrar-Ist, Tehsil Koal, district Aligarh to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Tiwari, Krishna Dev Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Prashant Ojha .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation along with certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no. 4 within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no. 4 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. September 19, 2025 Sumaira WRIC No. 33060 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad