Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97226 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH YADAV v. State of UP AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/31753/2024 · 2025-01-24

Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:12815-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31753 of 2024 Petitioner :- Om Prakash Yadav Respondent :- State Of Up And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Rai,Sandeep Maniji Bakhshi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,S.M. Iqbal Hasan Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the following prayers have been made by the petitioner:- "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned notice/objection dated 14.03.2024 issued by the respondent No.3/Sub-Registrar, Sadar, District Jaunpur. ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned certificate dated 02.06.2016 issued by District Minority Welfare Officer, Jaunpur restraining the sub-registrar Sadar Jaunpur. iii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned certificate dated 14.06.2016 issued by Central Board of waqf, UP at Lucknow in favour of Waqf Kamil Ali, Maqdoom Shah Bade at Jaunpur. iv. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.3/Sub-Registrar, Sadar, District Jaunpur to allow the respondent no 6 to execute the sale deed in favour of the petitioner v. Issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court' may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. vi. Award the cost of the petition to the Petitioner." 3. Upon perusal of the impugned orders and after hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, it is crystal clear that the provision of appeal lies against all these impugned orders. There is an alternative and effective remedy against these impugned orders. 4. In light of the same, we do not see any reason to interfere in our writ jurisdiction. 5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Kpy (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad