Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97211 (PNJ)

RAJA RAM (DECEASED) THR HIS LRS v. M/S RAGHUVEER MACHINERY PVT LTD AND ORS

LPA/360/2025 · 2025-04-22

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

LPA-360-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-360-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 22.04.2025 Raja Ram ......Appellant Versus M/s Raghuveer Private Limited and others .........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Present: Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate, for the appellant. *** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL) CM-916-LPA-2025 For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed and delay of 54 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. LPA-360-2025 (O&M) The challenge in the instant intra Court appeal is to the order dated 09.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, whereby writ petition (CWP-2255-2014) filed by respondent No.1-Management, was disposed of and it was directed to pay the appellant-Workman a sum of Rs.2 AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.28 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document LPA-360-2025 (O&M) -2- Lakhs towards full and final compensation as lump sum amount. 2. Vide judgment dated 25.03.2025, passed by this Court, a similar appeal i.e. LPA No.160-2025, along with six other appeals, arisen out of the same judgment dated 09.09.2024 (which is under challenge in this appeal), was dismissed by this Court. The issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment. 3. In view of the said fact, the present appeal is dismissed in the same terms as in LPA-160-2025. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 22.04.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.28 12:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document