Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 97205 (ALL)

SUDAMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/32842/2025 · 2025-09-17

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32842 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "1) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing Respondent No. 2, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Khadda, District Kushinagar, to undertake and complete the process of boundary demarcation and installation of boundary stones in respect of Plot No. 239, measuring 0.210 hectares, situated in Village Ramnagar Tappa- Batesara, Pargana C.J., Tehsil Khadda, District Kushinagar, in pursuance with the order dated 04.08.2025 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Khadda, District Kushinagar, in Case No. 3805/2025 (Computerized Case No. T202505440503805), titled Sudama v. Laxmi, under Section 24 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending adjudication before Respondent No. 2; and to ensure that such compliance is effected, expeditiously within a certain time frame as directed by this Hon'ble Court, expeditiously within a certain time frame as directed by this Hon'ble Court." 2. It is contended that order under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has already been passed on 04.08.2025, but the said order has not been complied with. In para 12 of the writ petition, it is stated that no appeal has been preferred against the order passed under Section 24. 3. In view of the said fact, as no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit, writ petition is being disposed of requiring Sub Divisional Officer/respondent no.2 to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Imtiyaj Ali, Izharul Haque Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti Sudama .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) proceed with the matter and carry out the order dated 04.08.2025, strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. 4. With the aforesaid observations, writ petition stands disposed of. September 18, 2025 SK Goswami WRIC No. 32842 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad